|
Comments: 69, viewing 1 - 20
Civil_War wrote on Aug 3rd, 2008 8:00amVixus wrote on Jul 19th, 2008 at 1:27pm :
Any physicists here? You know how cool we are. |
Yes, yes we are.
quote |
Vixus wrote on Jul 19th, 2008 1:27pmAny physicists here? You know how cool we are. quote |
_Tim_ wrote on Jun 25th, 2008 3:30pmWhat's Dizzy done with the ridiculous number of mods? quote |
Guitardude19 wrote on Jun 24th, 2008 9:03amciwwaf rulz wrote on Jun 23rd, 2008 at 10:18pm :
WOOT!!!!!!!!! I got my grades and I got a B in chemistry (high school) |
Congrats!
quote |
ciwwaf rulz wrote on Jun 23rd, 2008 10:18pmWOOT!!!!!!!!! I got my grades and I got a B in chemistry (high school) quote |
Guitardude19 wrote on Jun 3rd, 2008 3:37pmMy exams finished two weeks ago and I get my results next Friday. I think I done well. Watch my blog for results! quote |
Civil_War wrote on Jun 2nd, 2008 7:37pmSo, how's everyone doing with their exams? I've only had maths ones so far, first science one is Chemistry on wednesday. Much fun 
(Doing A-levels btw) quote |
Guitardude19 wrote on May 30th, 2008 11:20amZanasCross wrote on May 18th, 2008 at 5:14pm :
Guitardude19 wrote on May 15th, 2008 at 1:56pm :
I read that the sun is not hot enough to cause fusion of Hydrogen to Helium but I read that due to quantum tunnelling, the nuclie can fuse.
You read correctly. Due to the heisenberg uncertainty, the nuclei can violate conservation of energy for a small period of time, but a large enough time frame to begin the fusing process. This "loophole" is why the matter from all stars continuously fuses and never expands... because by the time it is fused, it doesn't have enough energy to explode past the gravity field of the star making it just re-fuse all the time. |
Awesome, thanks for verifying that for me.
quote |
ZanasCross wrote on May 18th, 2008 5:14pmGuitardude19 wrote on May 15th, 2008 at 1:56pm :
I read that the sun is not hot enough to cause fusion of Hydrogen to Helium but I read that due to quantum tunnelling, the nuclie can fuse. |
You read correctly. Due to the heisenberg uncertainty, the nuclei can violate conservation of energy for a small period of time, but a large enough time frame to begin the fusing process. This "loophole" is why the matter from all stars continuously fuses and never expands... because by the time it is fused, it doesn't have enough energy to explode past the gravity field of the star making it just re-fuse all the time.
quote |
|
Guitardude19 wrote on May 15th, 2008 1:56pmCivil_War wrote on May 15th, 2008 at 1:12pm :
Guitardude19 wrote on May 12th, 2008 at 12:47pm :
You are correct, it would have to be negative otherwise it cant occur. I just assumed that Gibbs could only be applied to a chemical system and not a physical nuclear reaction since nuclear reactions are governed by quantum rules.
I read that the sun is not hot enough to cause fusion of Hydrogen to Helium but i
but you...?
lol, is there a character limit to these comments? |
Gay.... Character limit! I didnt realise there was one :
I read that the sun is not hot enough to cause fusion of Hydrogen to Helium but I read that due to quantum tunnelling, the nuclie can fuse.
quote |
Civil_War wrote on May 15th, 2008 1:12pmGuitardude19 wrote on May 12th, 2008 at 12:47pm :
You are correct, it would have to be negative otherwise it cant occur. I just assumed that Gibbs could only be applied to a chemical system and not a physical nuclear reaction since nuclear reactions are governed by quantum rules.
I read that the sun is not hot enough to cause fusion of Hydrogen to Helium but i |
but you...?
lol, is there a character limit to these comments?
quote |
Guitardude19 wrote on May 12th, 2008 12:47pmCivil_War wrote on May 12th, 2008 at 12:42pm :
Guitardude19 wrote on Apr 29th, 2008 at 9:20am :
Ja das is true. Once you hit good old Fe, any fusion reaction is now endothermic and takes in energy!
I wonder if the Gibbs free energy for that process is +ve or -ve.... I know its not strictly a chemical reaction as such but the change in energy means it must still be a measurable process...
If my understanding of Gibb's Free Energy is correct (have only studied A level Chemistry at this present time) then it would have to be -ve otherwise we couldn't get elements heavier than Fe.
Though i'm sure my chemistry knowledge wanes a bit compared to a university chemist student such as yourself. |
You are correct, it would have to be negative otherwise it cant occur. I just assumed that Gibbs could only be applied to a chemical system and not a physical nuclear reaction since nuclear reactions are governed by quantum rules.
I read that the sun is not hot enough to cause fusion of Hydrogen to Helium but i
quote |
Civil_War wrote on May 12th, 2008 12:42pmGuitardude19 wrote on Apr 29th, 2008 at 9:20am :
Ja das is true. Once you hit good old Fe, any fusion reaction is now endothermic and takes in energy!
I wonder if the Gibbs free energy for that process is +ve or -ve.... I know its not strictly a chemical reaction as such but the change in energy means it must still be a measurable process... |
If my understanding of Gibb's Free Energy is correct (have only studied A level Chemistry at this present time) then it would have to be -ve otherwise we couldn't get elements heavier than Fe.
Though i'm sure my chemistry knowledge wanes a bit compared to a university chemist student such as yourself.
quote |
gonzaw wrote on Apr 30th, 2008 7:33pmCivil_War wrote on Apr 28th, 2008 at 4:03pm :
There are no energetically favourable fusion reactions which take place after Fe. So it would have to absorb energy instead of emitting... Nuclear implosion maybe? ^^ |
Right, but one could create some havoc till one gets to Fe....
Implosion? You wanna create a black hole or something
quote |
Guitardude19 wrote on Apr 29th, 2008 9:20amCivil_War wrote on Apr 28th, 2008 at 4:03pm :
There are no energetically favourable fusion reactions which take place after Fe. So it would have to absorb energy instead of emitting... Nuclear implosion maybe? ^^ |
Ja das is true. Once you hit good old Fe, any fusion reaction is now endothermic and takes in energy!
I wonder if the Gibbs free energy for that process is +ve or -ve.... I know its not strictly a chemical reaction as such but the change in energy means it must still be a measurable process...
quote |
Civil_War wrote on Apr 28th, 2008 4:03pmThere are no energetically favourable fusion reactions which take place after Fe. So it would have to absorb energy instead of emitting... Nuclear implosion maybe? ^^ quote |
gonzaw wrote on Apr 27th, 2008 10:14pm_Tim_ wrote on Apr 26th, 2008 at 2:37am :
I'm pretty sure its U-235.
Fission reactions are needed in the H bomb to create enough energy for the H atoms to fuse. U-238 absorbs the neutrons in the fission pr |
Yeah, it is U-235...
Maybe someone could make a sun-like fission bomb that will never end exploding, making an H-bomb, next a He-bomb (helium), then a C-bomb, Fe-bomb, and whatever the fusion reaction follows....
Imagine a everlasting explotion, or at least a long and powerful one...
Eh, on a second thought, forget about that
quote |
_Tim_ wrote on Apr 26th, 2008 2:37amgonzaw wrote on Apr 24th, 2008 at 8:28pm :
geluidsterroris wrote on Apr 24th, 2008 at 12:57pm :
I wanna make a H-bomb and take over the world. I already know how to build one. Is there Uranium-235 on eBay?
I think it is Uranium-238, but Uranium-235 or Plutonium-icantremember25 is better
My father wrote a story about a terrorist making an H-bomb I think with commonday things (like stealing from a farmacy, and combining substances in a bathtub, etc)...
You have to steal or get uranium oxide from any university or chemical house or whatever (like 50 pounds, with 20% uranium-235) and liquify it with hydrofluor acid I think, and then separate the U-235 from the U-238. Afterwards, enrich the U-235 (to like 90%) using some complicated bucket thing, and then turn it back into a solid metal form....
Then assemble everything... |
I'm pretty sure its U-235.
Fission reactions are needed in the H bomb to create enough energy for the H atoms to fuse. U-238 absorbs the neutrons in the fission pr
quote |
gonzaw wrote on Apr 24th, 2008 8:28pmgeluidsterroris wrote on Apr 24th, 2008 at 12:57pm :
I wanna make a H-bomb and take over the world. I already know how to build one. Is there Uranium-235 on eBay? |
I think it is Uranium-238, but Uranium-235 or Plutonium-icantremember25 is better
My father wrote a story about a terrorist making an H-bomb I think with commonday things (like stealing from a farmacy, and combining substances in a bathtub, etc)...
You have to steal or get uranium oxide from any university or chemical house or whatever (like 50 pounds, with 20% uranium-235) and liquify it with hydrofluor acid I think, and then separate the U-235 from the U-238. Afterwards, enrich the U-235 (to like 90%) using some complicated bucket thing, and then turn it back into a solid metal form....
Then assemble everything...
quote |
|
1 2 3 4 read next »
|
|